APPLIED TO FUEL AND ENERGY

Turn operating waste
into verified savings.

Connect the operating evidence, choose the corrective work and measure whether fuel, cost and project-level emissions actually improve.

RECOGNITION & PROGRAMMES

EUSP Top 50

European Startup Prize for Mobility

Energy Tech Summit

Finalist

ClimateLaunchpad

France finalist

Enerjim Sensin 2026

Accelerator programme

Try the fuel and energy decision examples ↗
PUBLISHED FIELD RESULT

118 vehicles. One depot.
A measured operating change.

A 90-day baseline and a complete 31-day post-change period supported the reported normalized fuel-intensity reduction.

8.1%Measured normalized fuel-intensity reduction
168,339 LAnnualized fuel savings
$260,925Annualized fuel-cost savings
448 tCO₂eAnnualized avoided project-level emissions

The operating owner accepted the measured 8.1% reduction. Annual fuel, cost and emissions estimates extend the 31-day result using the stated assumptions.

THE OPERATING LOOP

Make the change.
Keep the service working.

01

Understand the actual operation

Connect fuel cards, telematics, routes, load, maintenance, invoices and relevant site or meter data.

02

Compare corrective routes

Consider operating changes alongside delivery requirements, available capacity and their cost.

03

Authorize the work

Keep operational responsibility and approval with the accountable owner.

04

Measure the result

Compare against a stated baseline, normalize the relevant operating conditions and retain source evidence.

EXPLORE THE ECONOMICS

A simple fuel-savings estimate.

Estimate annual savings from your fuel use, assumed reduction and price per litre.

Calculator factor: 2.66 kgCO₂e per litre. Project calculations use the relevant fuel and accounting factors.

ANNUAL SCENARIO
162,000 LFuel avoided
$330,480Fuel cost avoided
430.9 tCO₂eProject-level emissions avoided
What is measured and what is estimated?

The fuel-intensity reduction is measured against the baseline. Annual savings project that result over a year using the stated operating assumptions.

What counts as financial value?

Cash savings measure reduced spending on fuel or energy. Staff time, reporting savings and internal carbon value are tracked separately.

Does this create carbon credits?

No. This measures project-level emissions savings. Carbon credits and corporate emissions reporting require their own verification and accounting.

How does this fit SupraOS?

The same operating loop connects evidence, resource decisions, approved corrective work and independently checked outcomes. Revenue is the first commercial domain; fuel and energy are an additional application.

PUT SUPRAOS TO WORK

Define an operating result you can measure.

Choose a fleet, route group or site, and the fuel or energy saving you want to achieve.