Understand the actual operation
Connect fuel cards, telematics, routes, load, maintenance, invoices and relevant site or meter data.
Connect the operating evidence, choose the corrective work and measure whether fuel, cost and project-level emissions actually improve.
European Startup Prize for Mobility
Finalist
France finalist
Accelerator programme
A 90-day baseline and a complete 31-day post-change period supported the reported normalized fuel-intensity reduction.
The operating owner accepted the measured 8.1% reduction. Annual fuel, cost and emissions estimates extend the 31-day result using the stated assumptions.
Connect fuel cards, telematics, routes, load, maintenance, invoices and relevant site or meter data.
Consider operating changes alongside delivery requirements, available capacity and their cost.
Keep operational responsibility and approval with the accountable owner.
Compare against a stated baseline, normalize the relevant operating conditions and retain source evidence.
Estimate annual savings from your fuel use, assumed reduction and price per litre.
Calculator factor: 2.66 kgCO₂e per litre. Project calculations use the relevant fuel and accounting factors.
The fuel-intensity reduction is measured against the baseline. Annual savings project that result over a year using the stated operating assumptions.
Cash savings measure reduced spending on fuel or energy. Staff time, reporting savings and internal carbon value are tracked separately.
No. This measures project-level emissions savings. Carbon credits and corporate emissions reporting require their own verification and accounting.
The same operating loop connects evidence, resource decisions, approved corrective work and independently checked outcomes. Revenue is the first commercial domain; fuel and energy are an additional application.
Choose a fleet, route group or site, and the fuel or energy saving you want to achieve.